Skip to main content Biblioteca Campus Monterrey - Tecnológico de Monterrey

Investigación: Rankings y Ratings

Su objetivo es facilitar la información más utilizada para realizar cualquier tipo de investigación desde una básica hasta una avanzada.

Menú

Principales Rankings a Nivel Mundial

Rankings a Nivel M​undial y sus criterios de evaluación.

Ranking

Descripción

Criterios de Evaluación

QS World UniversityRanking​

Publicado por: ​QS Quacquarelli Symonds

First compiled in 2004, the QS World University Rankings currently considers ov​​er 2,000 institutions, and rank​s over 800. The top 400 are ranked individually, whereas those placed 401 and over are ranked in groups.

The primary aim of the QS

World University Rankings is to help students make more informed comparisons between their international study options. 

40% Acade​mic Reputation from global survey
10% Employer Reputation from global survey
20% Faculty Student Ratio 20% Citations P​er Faculty from Scopus
5% Proportion of International Students
5% Proportion of International Faculty

QS University Rankings: Latin America

Publicado por: ​​QS Quacquarelli Symonds

Published annually since 2011, the QS University Rankings: Latin America highlights the 300 top universities in Latin America, based on seven indicators.

30% Academic Reputation from global survey
20% Employer Reputation from global survey
10% Faculty Student Ratio 10% Citations per Paper from SciVerse Scopus
10% Papers per Faculty from SciVerse Scopus
10% Proportion of staff with PHD
10% Web Impact from Webometrics

QS University Rankings: by Subject​

Publicado por: ​​QS Quacquarelli Symonds

The annual QS World University Rankings by Subject is a comprehensive guide to the world’s top universities in a range of popular subject areas:

  • Arts & Humanities
  • Engineering & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Medicine
  • Natural Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Using data on reputation and research citations, the rankings highlight the 200 top universities in the world for 30 individual subjects.

The methodology for QS World University Rankings by Subject has been narrowed to include only those indicators that bypass the direct involvement of institutions and can reliably be stratified by subject discipline.

There are four main criteria that are evaluated in QS University Ranking by Subject, the weight for each one vary in each subject depending on the pertinence of the indicator and the validity of the data.:

  • Academic reputation
  • Employer Reputation
  • Citations per Paper
  • H Index

QS Times Global 200 Business Schools Report 2014/15

Publicado por: ​​QS Quacquarelli Symonds

The QS Global 200 Business Schools Report originated in the early 1990s as an alternative to business school rankings. At the heart of the report was a definitive list of 200 business schools from which employers prefer to recruit MBAs. The research was intended to be of use to MBA employers, prospective MBA students and institutions worldwide that are interested in international business education and recruitment trends.

For the 2014/15 report, QS has adopted a new methodology. The employability measure, based on our global survey of MBA employers, will now count for 85% of the final ranking. A second measure – academic reputation – based on a global faculty survey, will contribute 15% to the final ranking.

Global Employability University Ranking 2015 

Publicado por Times Higher Education

The Global Employability University Ranking 2015, designed and commissioned by French human resources consulting agency Emerging and carried out by the German market research firm Trendence.

Ranking that measures how universities perform on graduate employability.

The ranking was created from the combined votes of 2,200 recruiters and 2,400 managing directors of international companies or subsidiaries across 20 countries.

The online survey was completed between April and August 2015 by 2,287 recruiters from 21 countries: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the UK and the US. The countries were chosen on the basis that they are the main global players in higher education, accounting for more than 80 per cent of students worldwide, and have at least one internationally recognised university.

The ranking was created from the combined votes from two “panels”. For one panel, respondents from across the 21 countries were asked to indicate which institutions from a list of their local universities produced the most employable graduates. Companies could cast between three and 15 votes depending on how many of their country’s institutions were entered into the survey; Swiss recruiters, for instance, had just 11 universities to choose from, while US companies had 92. Companies that recruit internationally were also asked to vote for up to 10 universities in the world that, in their experience, produce the most employable graduates.

The second panel consisted of 2,400 managing directors of internationally recruiting companies (or subsidiaries) with more than 1,000 employees. Each cast a maximum of 10 votes for local or global universities. The ranking is based on the total number of votes each institution received.

Companies were also asked a series of questions about the characteristics they value in universities and graduates.

The Times HigherEducation BRICS & Emerging Economies Ranking

Publicado por: Thomson Reuters

The Times Higher Education World University Rankings offer global university performance tables to judge world class universities across all of their core missions - teaching, research, knowledge transfer and international outlook. The top universities rankings employ 13 carefully calibrated performance indicators to provide comprehensive and balanced comparisons available, which are trusted by students, academics, university leaders, industry and governments.​

13 performance indicators grouped into five areas:

  • ​Teaching: - 30%
  • Research: - 30%
  • Citations: - 30%
  • Income Industry: Innovation - 2.5%
  • International perspective: - 7.5%

Ranking Web de Universidades(webometrics)

Publicado por: Cybermetrics Laboratory, which belongs to the CSIC (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), in Spain.

The ranking is build using data published in open web (not in intranet) and indexed by search engines.

Activity and impact indicators (web visibility) are combined in a compound indicator, and a classification is produced with global coverage.

Activity Indicators 50% (publications and web contents), and impact indicators 50% (measured by the number of external links received: web visibility)​

URAP-University Ranking

Publicado por: The Institute of Informatics, Middle East Technical University, Turkey in 2009)

Main objective of URAP is to develop a ranking system for the world universities based on academic performances which determined by quality and quantity of scholarly publications.

URAP has gathered data about 3000 universities across the world in an effort to rank these organizations by their academic performance.

Number of Articles:- 21%.
Citation - 21%
Total Document - 10%
Journal Impact Total - 18%
Journal Citation Impact Total - 15%
International Collaboration – 15%

U-Multirank

Publicado por: ​U-Multirank is prepared with seed funding from the European Union and led by a consortium

U-Multirank takes into account aspects like teaching and learning, research, knowledge transfer, international orientation and regional engagement. The methodology combines institutional ranking (of whole institutions) with field-based rankings that focus on particular academic disciplines or groups of programs.

U-Multirank is prepared with seed funding from the European Union and led by a consortium: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS) in the Netherlands, Centre for Higher Education (CHE) in Germany,  Centre for Science and Technology Studies from Leiden University (CWTS), Catholic University Leuven, academic publishers Elsevier, the Bertelsmann Foundation, Push and software firm Folge 3.

Consider the five major dimensions of university activity:


1-teaching and learning
2-research
3-knowledge transfer
4-the international orientation
5-regional engagement.

4 ICU

Publicado por: 4icu.org

4 International Colleges & Universities (​4 ICU) is an international higher education search engine and directory reviewing accredited Universities and Colleges in the world. 4icu.org includes 11,307 Colleges and Universities, ranked by web popularity, in 200 countries.

Is based upon an algorithm including five unbiased and independent web metrics extracted from three different search engines:

Google Page Rank
Alexa Traffic Rank
Majestic Seo Referring Domains
Majestic Seo Citation Flow
Majestic Seo Trust Flow

​SIR: Scimago InstitutionsRankings

Publicado por: ​Scimago Research Group

The only goal of this report is to characterize research outcomes of organizations so as to provide useful scientometric information to institutions, policymakers and research manager so they are able to analyze, evaluate and improve their research results.

The Ibero-American SIR includes all higher education institutions of Ibero-American countries with at least one document published in the Scopus data base during the five-year period.

The Global SIR takes into account those organizations from any country, with at least 100 documents published in the last year of the five-year period

The SIR (SCImago Institutions Rankings) is a characterization of institutions, grounded on three sets of ranges based on research, innovation and web visibility indicators, as follows:

Research

  • Output
  • International Collaboration
  • Normalized Impact
  • High Quality Publications
  • Specialization Index.
  • Excellence Rate
  • Scientific Leadership
  • Excellence with Leadership.
  • Scientific talent pool.

Innovation

  • Innovative Knowledge
  • Technological Impact

Web

  • Web size

Domain’s inbound links